Page 42 - Transformation Indaba Report
P. 42

Excellence pipeline:  Lots of support, for PG students, and   impacts on research. Those who can’t publish or supervise
           lots of focus on how many we enroll and how many we grad-  students  will  not  make  it  in  the  system,  into  Associate
           uate. We provide a lot of support in terms of all the work-  Professor/Professor rank. As we recruit people into the
           shops, with the data that you showed, and then there is a   system, we need to think very carefully about their teaching
           lot of support and lots targeting early career researchers.   loads so that we can build the other academic missions to
           On the extreme end of the pipeline, you have high-end   ensure they’re in line to progress and get us the picture we
           research-active professoriate (SARChI Chairs/Directors of   want to see. The VC spoke about how it takes decades to
           entities/rated researchers) and again the system is geared   change things in the university. We accept that it’s going take
           up to support high performance. There’s funding for those   a decade for somebody to move from lecturer to Associate
           researchers. And then there’s what I call the “missing mid-  Professor. We accept that because you’ve got to produce
           dle” making up the bulk of the system/bulk of research-  the goods.  One PhD student will take three / four / five years
           ers. Yet in all the interventions, we seem to be targeting   to produce. But I think there must be a deliberate intention
           mostly early-career researchers and firmly established high-  to support people so that they can advance in the Academy.
           performing highflyers. But the system is not made up of ex-
           tremes but rather made up of the bulk of researchers. We   Another  issue  we  face  is:  now  we  have  this  huge
           need to think very carefully about what type of support we   investment  in  high performers  whom  I  also call  high-risk
           provide in terms of research support for those academics   because if we lose a Chair…let’s say we were to lose Prof
           because they make up the bulk of the system. What do we   Paul Watts then how are we going to replace Paul? What do
           do with them once they enter the system?            we build around our Chairs by way of support? We give our
                                                               Chairs postgraduate and doctoral students but no technical
           Data shows we are attracting a lot of black academics as   staff, which the Chair must raise money for.  If the Chair were
           associate lecturers/lecturers who make up the lower ranks   to leave, we then want to recruit a new Chair. Then what will
           of the Academy but what do we do with them once they’re   happen?  As at top levels, we do not have enough black
           here? We bury them in teaching!  The teaching loads are so   people. We’ve got competing needs - to attract a highflyer
           high. When I did my first teaching stint at Mandela Uni (as a   academic vs need to transform the Academy, (which is our
           lecturer + senior lecturer) I had 120 students, requiring me   responsibility). Our recruitment is inflexible because we can-
           to replicate the practical, (on a Tuesday and Thursday)   not keep bringing in white males (which is correct). What
           because our labs only accommodate 60 students. In some   must we then do? Whilst understanding and accepting the
           instances, we are not growing our infrastructure to absorb   transformation imperative and even being a champion for
           the massification that was spoken of earlier.  The person who   the transformation imperative, there must be a nuanced
           took my position now has a class of 240+ students, therefore   approach - where we weigh up the strategic nature of the
           his practical must be repeated four times. The growth in the   recruitment together against the transformation imperative.
           system hasn’t been matched with a corresponding growth in   And you have customized support for the high-end skill that
           infrastructure and numbers of academic staff which means   we may need to replace, accepting that losing a professor
           people spend a lot of time on teaching. Academics there-  and appointing 2 junior lecturers is not going to cut it if
           fore do not find time to do research which then restrains   we want to remain research active.  (Kwezi)
           their ability to publish, to supervise M and D students, and






          I deliberately chose to join this breakaway room because I   research outputs, show how many conferences you’ve been
          am a person who is interested in wanting to pursue the pro-  to, how many postgraduate students you’ve supervised, be
          fessor route. I’d like to do it here at Mandela University, but   involved in decolonisation and curriculum change and… the
          I’m concerned that I don’t know how to do it because it’s a   list goes on and on. So, while I continue to advance in my
          process which is very clouded in mystery. There are policy   own career, the point which I want to make is, this is a difficult
          documents which say “publish or perish” and you have to   system to be part of this idea of wanting to invest in the
          hit off teaching and learning, hit off engagement, hit off   associate and the full professor appointment rank. (Glen)





       NelsoN MaNdela UNiversity                    •                     traNsforMatioN iNdaba                    •                     2022      36
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47