Page 56 - Transformation Indaba Report
P. 56

welCome And golden threAds from dAy 1




        The  moderator,  Dr  Ruby-Ann  Levendal,  opened Day  Two   Language & multilingualism - the language policy is a crucial
        of the Indaba. Before outlining the session’s objectives, she   element that would drive that, and then also contributing
        reflected that the University had hosted a previous Trans-  towards student access and success, and the African identity,
        formation Indaba under the aegis of its former name, the   especially in terms of institutional culture and the academic
        Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University. Ruby-Ann present-  project.
        ed an overview of the themes emerging from Day One:
                                                               Holistic support and development - and this is at the level
        From  the six  break-away  discussion  rooms,  the  following  of both staff and students - where the support that is being
        themes and concepts emerged in the plenary feedback    provided to students to include both academic as well as other
        session: curriculum transformation, decolonisation, the dimen-  dimensions of support, especially in terms of mental wellness,
        sions of institutional culture, and student success. Ruby-  as there has been an increase in mental illnesses both within
        Ann noted that the conceptual framing of these concepts   our student population and staff.  An increase in burnout diag-
        needs to be unpacked so that there’s a common understand-  nosis and mental illness and this was found to impact on indi-
        ing of these concepts. A clear breakdown and understanding   viduals’ attitudes and behaviors within the institution, which in
        would provide guidance in terms of what needs to be done   turn impacts on institutional culture. The need to look at
        to embed these in the system.                          resourcing and whether the capacity within the various func-
                                                               tional units is adequate. With a changing HE environment,
        The  conceptual framing of different concepts that arose in   staff need to be well-equipped to deal with the changes that
        breakout room discussion, where curriculum transformation,   they are encountering and have appropriate skills develop-
        decolonisation, the dimensions of institutional culture and   ment opportunities.
        even student success needs to be unpacked so that there’s a
        common understanding of these concepts and also guidance   Measurement - there needs to be contextualisation of what-
        in terms of what needs to be done to embed that in the system.  ever is being measured in relation to transformation, at both
                                                               institutional as well as functional unit or entity level. Measure-
        Uneven implementation  - there  was  a sense  that  transfor-  ment needs to be at both quantitative and qualitative level.
        mation wasn’t really cascading down to departmental level   Accountability regarding reporting – the TMF colleagues will
        because everybody takes ownership of transformation in the   speak on this issue and share experience.
        institution, and if people don’t know then they cannot par-
        ticipate and cannot even dialogue around transformational   Resource stewardship - it was quite concerning to hear of the
        issues at their level or in various spaces, and student partici-  reliance of the university on subsidy as well as fees, and with
        pation is a crucial element in those discussions.      quite a huge proportion of our students being funded by
                                                               NSFAS the issue around that over-reliance was raised. Also,
        Diversification of the academy -  where we  do mention   the issue of increased student debt and enrollment targets
        diverse knowledge systems, but it isn’t necessarily reflected   not being met, and the University being penalised because
        in the current status quo. Also contributing towards that   missed targets. The issue around the teaching input-units
        would be issues of internationalisation, African partnerships   was quite a shocker and it’s anticipated that the University
        and collaborations, and the process of decolonisation which   will have a reduction in subsidy allocation of R90 million in
        would be enriched through the diversification of our acad-  2025, which will obviously impact resource availability.  Util-
        emy. There was also a sense that there was rigidity of the   isation  of digital  technologies  and other  sustainable  initia-
        systems, currently and that issue feeds into Theme 4.  tives, as cost saving mechanisms was part of feedback to
                                                               plenary on Day One, as well as the concern about the cost
        Conventional  approaches while doing things are maintain-  associated with maintaining a hybrid teaching model (online
        ed, and therefore there’s not necessarily creativity and inno-  and coming onto campus periodically). The issue of look-
        vation, and the constraints are at the regulatory level where   ing into alternative models of resource mobilisation. Lastly,
        one is constrained to not think outside-the-box.       international funding specifically in terms of research, to
                                                               become more competitive at the international level.






       NelsoN MaNdela UNiversity                    •                     traNsforMatioN iNdaba                    •                     2022      50
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61