Page 58 - Transformation Indaba Report
P. 58

everyday  practice  for  individual  staff  members.  Translating   un-implementable  due  to  poorly  articulated  indicators,  and
        institutional commitments into everyday practice is her chief   a lack of shared understanding. The new framework tries to
        focus area. Claire’s work also involves developing new transfor-  address some of these problems.
        mation policies that will better enable a Transformation Plan.
        She explained how accountability can be difficult when key   Building on UCT’s benchmarking, SU is trying to work towards
        strategic priorities lack clear definition. The M&E framework   better alignment, a shared understanding and clear and
        will help to bring about much needed definition and account-  measurable indicators. Claire pointed out that key processes
        ability. In 2015, SU adopted a Transformation Plan which arose   important to framework development include co-creating;
        out of the context of Fees Must Fall. The TP is located in Social   benchmarking; embedding; and articulating.
        Justice and the Bill of Rights. However, the Plan is somewhat






            mAndelA identity in the Context of university trAnsformAtion

            dAy 2, pAnel discUssion 2  │ Prof Verne Harris; Prof Crain Soudien; Prof Pamela Maseko;
                                                  Dr Muki Moeng; Patisanani Tokwana; Siyanda Qoto




        The TIMS panel discussion and speakers were introduced by   task to live up to, especially in considering the many role-
        Dr Ruby-Ann Levendal, Director: Transformation at Mandela   players involved in the resolution of issues such as free ed-
        University, who handed over to Professor Verne Harris who set   ucation – where the institution would normally be the one
        the tone and coordinated the discussion. The session began   that ‘takes the hit’. In light of this, the question of how we
        with a brief reflection on the line of enquiry, or theme,   could adopt a Mandela identity in the context of transform-
        called TIMS over the past several years – an intervention   ation was answered in a series of points.
        inspired  greatly  by  the University’s  current and  previous
        Vice-Chancellors,  Prof  Sibongile  Muthwa  and  Prof  Derrick   Professor Maseko’s input focused on the following two
        Swartz respectively. Quoting Council from 2017, Prof Harris   questions: i) Does the name Mandela have any implications
        went further, “Council has reflected on the transformations  for your field of study or discipline? If so, what are they?; and
        we need to make in order to align ourselves more appro-  ii) How should the name Mandela affect teaching and learning
        priately to the name, Mandela”. Prof Harris noted the social   at our University? The input here is also guided by the institu-
        media survey which had been rolled out to the University   tional strategic vision which urges for the establishment of an
        community over the past months and went further to note   African identity in our curriculum, and the need to be purpose-
        each of the five provocative questions from the survey. The  ful in our response to centuries of systematic and deliberate
        anticipated inputs from the panellists were centred around   marginalisation and erasure of indigenous ways of knowing –
        these questions, with Prof Crain Soudien having reviewed   and the reconstruction of that knowledge for solutions to local
        the survey data would share a provocation based on the data   and global challenges. Prof Maseko was also guided by the
        and a response to the inputs made by panellists.       possibilities presented by the Mandela stature to reimagine
                                                               Africa and attain what South American scholars call correc-
        Mr  Qoto’s  response  approached  the  questions  in  a  broad,   tive justice for Africa. The input is further led by the Faculty of
        general way, and began with an initial reflection on the Uni-  Humanities’ strategy to reimagine and revitalise our curric-
        versity’s name change in 2017 noting it to be a poisoned   ulum. In her response, Prof Maseko speaks to two areas in
        chalice: How could we as an institution of higher learning in   Mandela’s life. The first was the role that Mandela’s mother,
        these turbulent times possibly live up to the name? The   Nosekeni  Mandela,  had  played  in  the  development  of  his
        adoption of the name, Mandela, appeared to be a mammoth   character around integrity, resilience and all others attribut-








       NelsoN MaNdela UNiversity                    •                     traNsforMatioN iNdaba                    •                     2022      52
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63